Your web-browser does not support CSS, or you have CSS switched off. For a better web experience, I recommend using a modern browser. Until then, an older version of this site will look better in your browser.

Fri, 25 Mar 2005

Potentially new phrase of the day

The Soviets were fond of channeling resources into big, impressive heavy industries — steelmaking, for instance. Is this an example of “conspicuous production?”

(Sorry.)

Fun juxtapositions from the Democratic Peoples’ Republic of Cambridge

Where else but in Cambridge would these two establishments share a wall?

Wed, 23 Mar 2005

Oh, so that’s why no one replied to my email

While wondering idly why no-one had replied to my emails for a while, I checked the status of the spool and received some delightful news:

jdb@bigbox:~$ mailq
2005-03-22 16:28:01  563 bytes
2005-03-22 18:06:25  837 bytes
2005-03-22 18:07:12  25462 bytes
2005-03-22 23:09:25  1144 bytes
2005-03-22 23:28:17  2990 bytes
2005-03-23 00:28:01  563 bytes
2005-03-23 04:07:01  562 bytes
2005-03-23 04:07:10  1068 bytes
2005-03-23 04:07:10  1206 bytes
2005-03-23 04:22:01  2054 bytes
2005-03-23 06:38:54  18937 bytes
2005-03-23 08:28:01  563 bytes
2005-03-23 10:38:16  2898 bytes
2005-03-23 10:42:10  2547 bytes
2005-03-23 10:43:40  2010 bytes
2005-03-23 10:44:26  1038 bytes
2005-03-23 11:22:40  523 bytes
2005-03-23 13:27:31  1401 bytes
2005-03-23 14:56:11  982 bytes
2005-03-23 16:14:35  3904 bytes
2005-03-23 16:28:01  561 bytes
2005-03-23 16:37:41  943 bytes
2005-03-23 19:35:21  494 bytes
2005-03-23 21:04:18  6257 bytes

Mail had been backing up for the past 24 hours and I hadn’t even noticed it. It wouldn’t be the first time this had happened – frequent wedging was one reason why I switched from exim to nullmailer, on the principle that a simpler mta would be a more reliable MTA (that, and Harvard firewalls port 25, so there was no point in running a real SMTP server anyway).

Restarting nullmailer cleared the queue, but left me wondering how to notify myself next time this happened. I couldn’t use email, for obvious reasons. I considered having a sound play through the speakers if the queue seemed wedged, but that would only work when I was at home.

I settled on a cron job to periodically dump the output from mailq to a file. My RSS reader, feedonfeeds, now prepends this file’s contents in giant honking red letters to my RSS display — procrastination via RSS now has a purpose!

While writing this, it occured to me that another solution would be to alias mutt to a script that alerted me if the queue was non-empty before running mutt:

#!/bin/sh

# warns user if WATCH's output is nonempty before running mutt

MUTT=/usr/bin/mutt
WATCH=/usr/bin/mailq
TMP=`/bin/tempfile`

$WATCH > $TMP

if [[ -s $TMP ]] ; then
    less $TMP ;
fi

rm $TMP

$MUTT

Tue, 22 Mar 2005

GSAS vote result

From: Benjamin G Lee <bglee@fas>
To: gradsdirect@deas
Subject: [gradsdirect] FW: poll results
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:06:11 -0500

Results of the GSAS vote on Larry Summers:

Total participants: 1543

1. I lack confidence in the leadership of Lawrence H. Summers.

Affirm - 608
Deny - 699
Abstain - 90
Need more information - 146

2. I regret the President's mid-January statements about women in
science and the adverse consequences of those statements for individuals
and for Harvard; and also regret aspects of the President's managerial
approach. I appreciate the President's stated intent to address these
issues, and to seek to meet the challenges facing Harvard in ways that
are collegial and consistent with longstanding faculty and student
responsibilities in institutional governance.

Affirm - 945
Deny - 362
Abstain - 149
Need more information - 87

The first question is (at least) direct. I’m pleasantly surprised that President Summers garnered a majority of the votes cast for a position (rather than abstentions and NMI).

The second question is a mishmash of several questions that any useful poll would separate; everybody who voted on it probably interpreted it differently.

How to score an above-the-title slot on the Drudge Report

By now, everyone’s heard of the website whose owner promises to butcher and eat Toby, his pet rabbit, unless he receives US$50,000 by the end of June. As with the infamous Bonsai Kitten, Snopes says that it’s a hoax.

Toby’s owner had the right idea, but he wasn’t exploitative enough: I’d like to see a website whose owner vows to have an abortion unless she receives some enormous amount of PayPal donations in the next nine (eight…seven…six..five…four…) months. (Bonus points if the “mother” fakes her photo the old-fashioned way using a balloon, rather than just stealing pictures from Google Images or launching Photoshop.)

Maybe Drudge will dust off his flashing-police-beacon animated GIF for this one.

Mon, 21 Mar 2005

Troll of the week

Don’t miss this excellent, excellent troll post from insidehighered.com. It’s 1500 words of a college instructor complaining about students leaving his class to use the bathroom. The comments range from incredulous to irate, which is the hallmark of a truly great troll. It’s not quite up to the quality of Is your son a computer hacker?, but it’s very, very close.

Text of the GSAS poll on President Summers

The Graduate Student Council of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences is holding a poll on the same questions that the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (the faculty responsible for Harvard College and GSAS) considered last week. The text of the poll is below:

Graduate Student Vote on President Summers



Questions marked with a red asterisk (*) are required. You must answer all required questions to have this survey considered complete.

You are logged in as: Joseph Barillari  (HUID: redacted)

(your answers will be separated from your identity before they are visible to course staff)Last Tuesday the FAS faculty voted “lack of confidence” in President Summers. Today and tomorrow GSAS students will have chance to vote anonymously on the same question. Harvard and the world want to know what thousands of Harvard graduate students think about their university president.

Polls will be open from 7am Monday (March 21) to 5pm Tuesday (March 22).

The two questions are those offered to faculty last week.

It’s a quick and easy process, and the results are vital to the ongoing debate.

1.*

I lack confidence in the leadership of Lawrence H. Summers.

 

 

Affirm
Deny
Abstain
Need more information

 

2.*

I regret the President’s mid-January statements about women in science and the adverse consequences of those statements for individuals and for Harvard; and also regrets aspects of the President’s managerial approach. I appreciate the President’s stated intent to address these issues, and seek to meet the challenges facing Harvard in ways that are collegial and consistent with longstanding faculty and student responsibilities in institutional governance.

 

 

Affirm
Deny
Abstain
Need more information

 
 

Copyright ©The President and Fellows of Harvard College

I would be curious to know the results of both polls broken down by department; or even just with the science and non-science departments separated.

I’d be wasting pixels if I commented on the controversy itself; instead, I’ll point the reader to FAS Prof. Steven Pinker, who published a detailed treatment of it in TNR. Shortly after President Summers’s speech, he also appeared in a delightful interview in the Crimson:

CRIMSON: Were President Summers’ remarks within the pale of legitimate academic discourse?
PINKER: Good grief, shouldn’t everything be within the pale of legitimate academic discourse, as long as it is presented with some degree of rigor? That’s the difference between a university and a madrassa.

Update: see this.

Fri, 18 Mar 2005

Kristof’s peanut gallery

Nick Kristof is one of the two NYT columnists who are still worth a read. (The other one should be obvious. ) China Wakes and Thunder from the East aren’t bad, either. But the most entertaining Kristof content comes from his blog at the Times, where he posts selections from readers’ letters. If you want truly to see truly bad political prognostication, look no further than here:

I’m rushing around, getting ready for a trip to Africa, but here’s a sampling of email about my Hillary column. Ted from Minneapolis writes:
Energy conservation, energy self-sufficiency and global environmental crisis management will be the overriding issues of the next 20 years, not abortion. Hillary Clinton is not well-positioned to get elected or to deal with the real problems. If she were, I’d back her.

Emphasis mine. A real Karl Rove, this one.