Your web-browser does not support CSS, or you
have CSS switched off. For a better web experience, I recommend
using a modern
browser. Until then, an older
version of this site will look better in your browser.
The NYT ran an article on how nice young men are bilking retirees out of their money
by selling them insurance products that they don’t need. Since there isn’t much in the way of hard numbers, it’s hard to know how many people have really been affected (Massachusetts is considering action against some of the insurers, though.) However, I’m amazed at the way some things are phrased:
Regulators say annuities that begin paying immediately are often sound investments for retirees. A 73-year-old customer of one popular annuity, for instance, is guaranteed to begin immediately receiving $252 a month for life, in exchange for a $30,000 payment. If the buyer lives more than 10 years, that income is greater than the original amount paid.
That’s actually wrong. Sure, 10 times 12 times $252 is $30240, which
is greater than the initial $30,000 outlay, but if you factor in the
discount rate (how much you could have made if you parked your money
elsewhere), you’re deeply in the hole after ten years compared to just
sticking the money in a high-intrest bank account. (See net present
value )
Right now, you can open a risk-free FDIC-insured account that pays 5%
annually. (HSBC, for instance, has such an account.) Maybe you think
that the feds will rejigger the risk-free interest rate
(currently a shade
under 5%), so let’s be conservative and say that you expect a 3%
absolutely risk-free rate of return (compounded yearly). If the best
you could expect is 3%, that $252 monthly outflow is only worth about
$26,600 discounted at a 3% annual rate. You’d have to live about 12
years for your $30,000 to be worth $30,000 in today’s dollars. If the
interest rate were higher (say, today’s 5%), it would take you just
under 14 years to reach that point.
The advantage of the annuity is that it provides insurance in case you
run out of savings before you die. Suppose that you put your $30,000
in such an account and made $252 withdrawls every month. At 3%
interest (compounded monthly), it would take a shade under 12 years to
deplete your savings – during which time you still had the option of
moving your money elsewhere (say, if you wanted to help your grandkids
make a down payment on a house). Of course, if you lived much longer
than those 12 years (5% interest buys you an extra year and a half or
so), you’d be in trouble, which I suppose is the point of an
annuity. If you had an investment that paid 11.25% or so, you could
live without touching the principal – but it’s unlikely that you’ll
get that risk-free.)
The whole business seems a bit macabre, but insurance companies can
cover the costs of unusually long-lived holders by setting payouts
properly. (That’s assuming that they can’t earn at least 11.25% on
their invested income, which would mean they wouldn’t need to worry
how long the annuity-holders lived.) One shouldn’t, however, pay an
annuity to just one person unless you’ve set it up to profit no matter
how long they live. Or you might end up like François
Raffray:
Jeanne Louise Calment (February 21, 1875 August 4, 1997)
reached the longest confirmed lifespan in history at 122 years and 164
days. Her lifespan has been thoroughly documented by scientific study;
more records have been produced to verify her age than for any other
case.
In 1965, aged 90, with no living heirs, Jeanne Calment signed a deal, common in France, to sell her condominium apartment en viager to lawyer François Raffray. Raffray, then aged 47, agreed to pay a monthly sum until she died, an agreement sometimes called a “reverse mortgage”. At the time of the deal the value of the apartment was equal to ten years of payments. Unfortunately for Raffray, not only did Calment survive more than thirty years, but Raffray died of cancer in December 1995, at the age of 77, leaving his widow to continue the payments.
A while back, the apartment had a mouse problem. A., since he was
often up most of the night, saw a mouse scurrying around. I think
E. mentioned that he’d seen it, too. Then I found a mysterious hole in
a sealed bag of food I’d left in my room. Then I began to see the
mouse itself: it showed up outside the common room, but escaped
before I could catch it. Then, one day, I was tapping out an email and
heard a rustling — it was rummaging through the stuff on top of my
dresser (heaven knows how it managed to climb up there), with me ten
feet away and the lights blazing!
Needless to say, when I crept over to catch it, it bolted. I
discovered that it had chewed its way into a ziploc of
chocolate-covered coffee beans, and had eaten the chocolate off of
every last one of them. Coffee beans and chocolate dust were
all over the dresser. (Picky little snot, wasn’t it.)
I decided that this was a good impetus to clean the room. I vacuumed
up all of the beans, removed the radiator covers and looked for
bolt-holes, stopped storing my luggage (could be nesting material!)
under the bed, and plugged every hole I could find, which turned out
to be just one very small gap in the baseboard in the corner. I
couldn’t imagine even a mouse fitting through it, but I haven’t seen
it since.
I even set a trap: a deep pickle-jar with some sunflower-seed butter
and granola and a wooden ramp leading to the mouth. It was never
disturbed. Maybe the hole was its point of entry.
Then, I was browsing the Intarweb today, and discovered that you can’t
feed chocolate to your pet mice. It’s toxic to
them.
I thought I’d take a few minutes to upload this video of the Harvard
Law School building-moving
project to YouTube. As
usual, the project stretched into three or four hours, complete with
the usual triumvirate of poorly-documented software, inexplicable error
messages, and mysterious crashes.
Now, the geeky part. If you’re not a computer nerd, the rest of this
post may bore you.
I wanted to concatenate a bunch of videos I took with my camera,
rotate the ones that I took at a 90 degree angle, strip out a few
seconds of chaff, and append a title card to each end. And I wanted to
speed them up. It’s impressive to see a house creep down a street at
all, but on the Internet, no-one wants to spend more than a minute on
it.
I settled for concatenating the videos. (And speeding them up.) Here’s
what actually worked, after several zillion different things that
didn’t:
Use transcode on Linux to concatenate
the AVI files together. (Concatenating them with cat
and running them through mencoder is a bad idea
(despite what some may
suggest
) – it produced a file that crashed most of other programs I tried
to run on it. Concatenation is easy: avimerge -o out.avi -i
in1.avi in2.avi in3.avi …
Use VirtualDub” to speed up the
video. Go to Video->Frame Rate. Click “Change to ___ frames per
second” and set that to some multiple of the original frame rate (I
used 10, so 15 fps became 150 fps). To ensure that the file is not
insanely large, you also have to decimate the video. Click “Decimate
by ___” and fill in the multiple of the frame rate you used (10, in
this case.) N.B.: transcode is a Linux program and
VirtualDub is a windows program, so I needed two boxen just to
upload a video to YouTube! Of course, I’m hardly the first to
rant about this stuff.
Compress the video (Video->Compression), because YouTube only
handles videos up to 100MB. I just picked the first codec that
worked “Indeo® video 5.10”). (I also dropped the audio (Audio->no
output, for a small savings.)
Upload it. This was the easy part.
Now, for the stuff that didn’t work:
VirtualDub has a wonderful interface for a piece of free video
software. It may be the only piece of free video software with a
wonderful interface. The problem with VirtualDub is that it’s
fantastically finicky about the video it will take. This became an
issue when I tried to paste my title cards (15 fps) onto my video
(15.00015 fps). Yes, of course, it refused.
Avidemux, despite being possessed of a…utilitatian (but very
functional) GTK2 interface, didn’t refuse to concatenate video
because of a tiny difference in the frame rate. The problem was that
it would randomly stop opening the videos it produced for reasons I
never understood. I’d use it to append a bunch of mpegs
together. (These were either straight from the camera or from the
camera via VirtualDub, where I’d rotated and cropped them.) It would
happily save the concatenated video to a file…then refuse to open
it. I’d open one of those files, and the application would instantly
quit without so much as an error message.
So I switched back to Linux. I took the clips that I’d rotated and
cropped and tried assembling them using the
catandmencoder method. Flop: I couldn’t slice
out the extra frames using the VirtualDub decimator. VirtualDub
would abort 1/3 of the way in and complain that the file was
corrupt. Same deal if I used the avimerge technique.
So I switched to Linux again. My guess as to how to drop the
unnecessary frames didn’t work: I tried the
–frame_interval option to transcode…but
transcode promptly crashed. Like this:
jdb@bigbox:/mnt/max/park$ transcode -i merge.avi --frame_interval 120 -o fast.avi
transcode v1.0.3 (C) 2001-2003 Thomas Oestreich, 2003-2004 T. Bitterberg
(dvd_reader.c) no support for DVD reading configured - exit.
[transcode] (probe) suggested AV correction -D 0 (0 ms) | AV 0 ms | 0 ms
[transcode] auto-probing source merge.avi (ok)
[transcode] V: import format | MJPG RIFF data, AVI (V=ffmpeg|A=avi)
[transcode] V: import frame | 320x240 1.33:1
[transcode] V: bits/pixel | 1.562
[transcode] V: decoding fps,frc | 15.000,0
[transcode] V: Y'CbCr | YV12/I420
[transcode] A: import format | 0x1 PCM [11024, 8,1] 176 kbps
[transcode] A: export | disabled
[transcode] V: encoding fps,frc | 15.000,13
[transcode] A: bytes per frame | 733 (734.933333)
[transcode] A: adjustment | 1936@1000
[transcode] V: IA32/AMD64 accel | sse (sse 3dnowext 3dnow mmxext mmx asm C)
tc_memcpy: using sse for memcpy
[transcode] warning : no option -y found, option -o ignored, writing to "/dev/null"
[transcode] V: video buffer | 10 @ 320x240
[import_avi.so] v0.4.2 (2002-05-24) (video) * | (audio) *
[import_ffmpeg.so] v0.1.12 (2004-05-07) (video) ffmpeg: MS MPEG4v1-3/MPEG4/MJPEG
[export_null.so] v0.1.2 (2001-08-17) (video) null | (audio) null
[import_avi.so] format=0x1, rate=11024 Hz, bits=8, channels=1, bitrate=176
[transcode] input is mjpeg, reducing range from YUVJ420P to YUV420P
[filter.c] Filter "levels=output=16-240:pre=1" with args (levels=output=16-240:pre=1)
[filter.c] Filter "levels=output=16-240:pre=1" not loaded. Loading ...
[filter.c] Loading (levels=output=16-240:pre=1) ..
[filter_levels.so]: v1.0.0 (2004-06-09) Luminosity level scaler #0
[filter_levels.so]: scaling 0-255 gamma 1.000000 to 16-240
[filter_levels.so]: pre-processing filter
[mjpeg @ 0xb6953c68]invalid id 23618.38 fps, EMT: 0:05:53, ( 0| 0| 0)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
(Sharp-eyed readers will note that that command wouldn’t have done
anything anyway, because the computer complained that I didn’t pass a
-y argument, so it wrote its output to /dev/null. I
didn’t notice this until just now. I tested it with an actual
-y argument: -y mjpeg,null (because the input was
mjpeg). That also bombed:
jdb@bigbox:/mnt/max/park$ transcode -i merge.avi --frame_interval 120 -o fast.avi -y mjpeg,null
transcode v1.0.3 (C) 2001-2003 Thomas Oestreich, 2003-2004 T. Bitterberg
(dvd_reader.c) no support for DVD reading configured - exit.
[transcode] (probe) suggested AV correction -D 0 (0 ms) | AV 0 ms | 0 ms
[transcode] auto-probing source merge.avi (ok)
[transcode] V: import format | MJPG RIFF data, AVI (V=ffmpeg|A=avi)
[transcode] V: import frame | 320x240 1.33:1
[transcode] V: bits/pixel | 1.562
[transcode] V: decoding fps,frc | 15.000,0
[transcode] V: Y'CbCr | YV12/I420
[transcode] A: import format | 0x1 PCM [11024, 8,1] 176 kbps
[transcode] A: export | disabled
[transcode] V: encoding fps,frc | 15.000,13
[transcode] A: bytes per frame | 733 (734.933333)
[transcode] A: adjustment | 1936@1000
[transcode] V: IA32/AMD64 accel | sse (sse 3dnowext 3dnow mmxext mmx asm C)
tc_memcpy: using sse for memcpy
[transcode] V: video buffer | 10 @ 320x240
[import_avi.so] v0.4.2 (2002-05-24) (video) * | (audio) *
[import_ffmpeg.so] v0.1.12 (2004-05-07) (video) ffmpeg: MS MPEG4v1-3/MPEG4/MJPEG
[export_null.so] v0.1.2 (2001-08-17) (video) null | (audio) null
[export_mjpeg.so] v0.0.5 (2003-07-24) (video) Motion JPEG | (audio) MPEG/AC3/PCM
[import_avi.so] format=0x1, rate=11024 Hz, bits=8, channels=1, bitrate=176
[transcode] input is mjpeg, reducing range from YUVJ420P to YUV420P
[filter.c] Filter "levels=output=16-240:pre=1" with args (levels=output=16-240:pre=1)
[filter.c] Filter "levels=output=16-240:pre=1" not loaded. Loading ...
[filter.c] Loading (levels=output=16-240:pre=1) ..
[filter_levels.so]: v1.0.0 (2004-06-09) Luminosity level scaler #0
[filter_levels.so]: scaling 0-255 gamma 1.000000 to 16-240
[filter_levels.so]: pre-processing filter
*** glibc detected *** transcode: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x080f97a8 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/libc.so.6[0xb7e8682d]
/lib/libc.so.6[0xb7e8726c]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_memalign+0xab)[0xb7e8812b]
/usr/lib/libavutil.so.1d(av_malloc+0x2d)[0xb7fc155d]
======= Memory map: ========
<snip>
Aborted (core dumped)
I couldn’t find an equivalent option in mencoder, so I decided that
the rotate-and-crop videos must have been corrupted. I ditched them
and went back to the the raw ones from the camera. After some
fiddling, these actually worked.
In retrospect, I probably could have tried using VirtualDub to
assemble the cropped-and-rotated videos (I didn’t before, because I
was trying to add my title cards, which it wouldn’t do – at least,
I couldn’t produce title cards that it would take.) Ah, well. Next
time.
Here’s more from the “unsolicited parenting advice” department:
This
is what 3 a.m. looks like at the Costello house, a diminutive red
brick three-story in the West Village: On the second floor, Harrison,
age 5, is splayed, sideways and snoring, across his
parents. king-size, Anglo-Indian four-poster, having muscled his
mother out completely and pushed his father, Paul, a 35-year-old
photographer, to the extreme edge of the bed.
[…]
“I used to get hysterical and wonder, what is this new life of
stumbling around in the middle of the night?” Ms. Costello said. “Now
it’s just so oddly part of the routine. Paul and I wonder, will we
ever sleep together again?”
W. T. F.
Allow me to rip off an Internet celebrity: if your kids aren’t capable of handling the “stay the hell out of the bedroom” rule, then you have failed as a parent.
It’s parenting like that that creates kids like this.
IT’S difficult when you have a kid,” the photographer Justine Kurland
said. “If they’re in a good mood, you can get work done. But if
they’re in a bad mood, you’re at their mercy.”
Ms. Kurland is known for photographing people in American wilderness
landscapes, but the scene this day was the rent-stabilized apartment
she shares with Casper, her 2-year-old son, on the Lower East Side of
Manhattan.
Casper, named for the 19th-century German landscape painter Caspar
David Friedrich, had just given a textbook example of one of his
trickier moods. His father, the sculptor and multimedia artist Corey
McCorkle, who lives 10 blocks away, arrived to take him out for
breakfast, but he refused to budge. Instead he sat sobbing, rooted to
the kitchen floor, a stunt Ms. Kurland said he increasingly liked to
pull when she was scouting locations on the extended road trips she
takes for her projects. [continued…]
AAAAAAGH! I can’t even COUNT how many times my parents pulled that
stunt on me as a kid. I wanted to stay home; instead, I got a tour of
the most boring parts of Massachusetts from the backseat of the
car. Every. Single. Weekend. I’m surprised that I didn’t start huffing
paint thinner.
For heaven’s sake, lady: Leave. The. Kid. At. Home. It’s not as though
she’s living in North Dakota – this is NYC. She can find a nanny. And
it’s not as though she has to pay through the nose to avoid the nanny problem
— she’s an artist, not a politician. Hire an illegal; no-one’s going
to check.
My parents wouldn’t have even needed a nanny — just park me in
front of the Nintendo, thank you very much. It would have been good
practice for the interminable hours of being parked in front of a
computer in college.
TechCrunch has a gushing post about
Yahoo! Pipes, which is some sort of graphical RSS-feed-editing
service. You can drag little boxes around to combine news feeds,
deleting posts that match certain criteria, keeping others, and publishing the result as a new RSS feed.
I can think of some uses for this, but I’m not quite as enthusiastic
as Michael Arrington.It’s very slick, but I’m not sure who the
intended audience is.
To Yahoo’s credit, the UI is so intuitive that in a few minutes, I’d
whipped up a new feed
for Guy Kawasaki’s blog that strips out his oh-so-cute minced
oaths “bull-shitake” and
“full of sushi.” Here’s what it looks like:
Unfortunately, I couldn’t figure out how to replace the phrases—I
could only delete the offending posts in their entirety. Call it
collateral damage in the war on preciousness.
For making it really, really easy for me to not vote for him:
A forthcoming bill in the U.S. Senate lays the groundwork
for a national database of illegal images that Internet service
providers would use to automatically flag and report suspicious
content to police.
The proposal, which Sen. John McCain is planning to introduce on
Wednesday, also would require ISPs and perhaps some Web sites to alert
the government of any illegal images of real or “cartoon”
minors. Failure to do would be punished by criminal penalties
including fines of up to $300,000.
[…]
It also covers obscene images of minors including ones in a
“drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting.” (The language warns that
it is not necessary “that the minor depicted actually exist.”)
I suppose that means
this image of
a naked bearded man fondling a naked boy would be illegal. (Note, of
course, that it’s a tondo painted 470 BC that today resides in the Ashmolean
Museum.)
The real problems in the U.S. are obvious: social security is
doomed. Congress can’t control its spending and doesn’t want to
try. Iraq appears to be entering a civil war. Ten million
illegal immigrants are living in the U.S.; a non-trivial minority of
whom are involved in organized crime. Public education is a trainwreck
in progress.
But no presidential candidate has the spine to tackle these
problems. Instead, we get feel-good legicrap like the baseball steroid
hearings, the Terry Schiavo travesty, the everyone-knew-it-was-doomed
Federal Marriage Amendment, and this.
Are child molesters escaping justice because we lack a law that forces
ISPs to face fines of $300,000 for failing to report ancient Greek
paintings? I have my doubts.
But there’s a silver lining. I might have actually struggled over the
campaign-finance issue, because I thought McCain’s views were, besides
that, decent. But now that he’s cast his lot with the panderers,
“pay no attention to the abortion that is the federal budget—Here!
Over here! We’re saving your kids from perverts!” crowd, it will be
very, very easy to vote for someone else.
That he managed to take a giant dump on the Internet industry in the
process (since they’ll have to police their customers or face enormous
fines) is icing on the cake. I have an idea: every time the Feds want
to delegate the functions of government to private industry, they
should be required to estimate how much it will cost American
business. Ditto federal agency rulemaking. If corporations have to
file environmental impact statements, I daresay that the government
should be expected to file business impact statements. (We already
have the Paperwork Reduction Act and the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, so this isn’t entirely
implausible.)
From the “The 100% of the Usage Panel recommends that this phrase be taken out and shot” department:
“mommy wars”
When Drudge picks up an AP story about the thirty-something full-time
mother of four who lobs a fragmentation grenade from the cockpit of
her kid-filled Lincoln Navigator through the open top of her
high-powered-childfree-consultant (and Yale classmate)’s BMW M3
while they sit stranded in traffic on I-80, then, and only then,
will I feel comfortable with the phrase.
Kafka on the Charles, Chinese child theft, and the usual sex scandals
Two stories hit the wires recently: a tiff between Princeton
University and the townies (dog bites man; sky blue) and a child
custody dispute in Tennessee. Both emerge from a little-discussed and
highly sordid corner of college life: University justice.
First, from the Princetonian,
there’s a fight between Princeton University and the local prosecutor
over a case of assault involving some undergraduates. What appears to
be at issue is the University’s judicial process, which the locals
think is interfering with their investigation.
For reasons that also remain unclear, Mercer County
assistant prosecutor William Burns threatened the University with
legal action when it began its internal disciplinary hearing.
“If you continue to demand [that the victim] supply documents
pertaining to any criminal charges, you may be charged with
… Obstructing the Administration of Law [and] Hindering
Prosecution,” Burns was quoted as writing to the University on Jan. 8,
according to a reply letter by University General Counsel Peter
McDonough.
Given that the University judicial process (oops, two judicial
processes — the Honor Committee, which handles in-class cheating,
and the Committee on Discipline, which handles everything else) has
never been a shining example of transparency, I tend to side with its
critics, whatever their reasons. Unfortunately, the article doesn’t
tell us prosecutor’s beef is.
The alleged assault victim’s lawyer has a more pointed critique:
The recent conflicts between the University and law
enforcement authorities show that current practice of dual,
independent frameworks is unacceptable, Murphy said. Calling the
University disciplinary process an attempt to “resemble a
fully-functional mini-criminal trial,” Murphy said that the
University’s efforts usurped the power of local authorities.
My feelings exactly — you’ll see why in a moment.
A bigger-deal case just made the national headlines: a Chinese couple
won custody of their daughter after the Tennessee Supreme Court
overturned the decision of a Memphis judge who had awarded custody
to a foster family.
According to the article, the parents, Shaoqiang He, and his wife, Qin
Luo He, fell upon hard times and sent their month-old daughter to live
with another family [editor’s note: WTF?!] temporarily. When they
wanted her back, the other family refused to give her up.
The case spurred the usual complaints about anti-Chinese prejudice in
the judicial system; how it was stacked against foreigners with poor
English; the usual. (Interestingly, half of the Google hits during my
searches on the subject were from English-language versions of Chinese
newspapers.) But that’s not the interesting part. The interesting part
is how the He family’s financial difficulties came
about. According to the AP story:
Anna Mae was born in 1999 shortly after her father, a student at the
University of Memphis, was accused of a sexual assault. He was
ultimately acquitted, but the charge cost him a scholarship and the
student stipend that was his family’s primary source of income.
A 24 January 2002 article from Life magazine provides a bit more detail.
Anna Mae was born on Jan. 28, 1999, into poverty and turmoil. Her father, “Jack” Shaoqiang He, 37 – known around this friendly Southern town as “Mister He” – was a visiting college professor from China who came to the USA on a student visa and was pursuing a doctorate in economics at the University of Memphis.
Here he married “Casey” Qin Luo, 34, a Chinese woman he met through a friend back home. She spoke no English, but she shared his strong faith and love for America, Mister He says. They planned to build a good life together.
But in 1998, when Casey was pregnant with Anna Mae, her husband was charged with assaulting a fellow student. He and the student, a Chinese woman named Xiaojun Qi (pronounced Key), went to a computer lab alone; a week later Qi went to school officials, displayed bruises and said Mister He caused them during a sexual assault.
Mister He vehemently denies the allegation. He says he left the lab feeling uncomfortable after the woman asked him for a $500 loan. But the university dismissed him, his income from the university vanished and his student visa hung on his collegiate appeal.
On Thanksgiving in 1998, the Hes left their one-bedroom apartment and went to the grocery store. They were attacked by several men, and Casey was knocked down. That night she began suffering vaginal bleeding. Her condition worsened until doctors finally, in January, delivered Anna Mae by C-section, one month premature.
With a $12,000 hospital bill, a criminal assault charge and a continuing legal fight to try to get reinstated at the university, the Hes sought help in caring for their baby. Friends at their church suggested a local adoption agency.
Mid-South Christian Services agreed to place the baby in a foster home for three months. They placed her with Jerry and Louise Baker.
One minor point: according to Factiva, the marriage between Shaoqiang
He, 37 and Qin Luo, 33, is listed in the marriages section of the
January 9, 2002 Memphis Commercial Appeal – meaning that the
parents would not have been married at the time of the birth of the
child in four years before, in 1998. Either the Appeal article is
mis-dated (it wouldn’t be the first time), or the Life author has
his timeline wrong (“husband” should have been “future husband.”)
Soon after the Baker family foster placement, the legal wrangling over
the child began. But the interesting part is how they got there: the
University judicial process that prompted the He family to place their
kid in foster care in the first place. It reminded me of a case on the
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education’s website:
A Harvard graduate student has been barred from
continuing his studies because a fellow student accused him of sexual
assault in January of 2002. The student was acquitted on all six
counts of rape and assault by Middlesex Superior Court last August and
his accuser was shown to be fabricating parts of her story at the
trial. Despite this, Harvard has not readmitted him and has not
dropped its own charges against him.
(FIRE, it should be noted, is a pressure group — if you hadn’t
guessed when you saw that they refer to Harvard as “Kafka on the
Charles.” Not that I disagree with much of what that they do.)
The Boston Globe
and the Harvard
Crimson also
covered the case. As a biographical tidbit, the non-assault didn’t
happen in Child Hall, which is right near where I used to live. It’s
the Gropius-designed wall on the left side of this
photo.
Apologies on the lack of a better picture.
I don’t know what has happened to the student in question, Georgi
Zedginidze. The latest word that I saw was a Crimson columnist blasting
the University’s policy of wrist-slapping convicted rapists while
simultaneously jack-booting the acquitted. The author laments the
“Coalition against Sexual Violence’s” successful demands to eliminate
the right of confrontation from the University judicial process.
Erin O’Connor, who writes about academic excess, had similar complaints about the He case back in 2004:
Had officials at the University of Memphis accorded Shaoqiang He due process, had they held firmly to the tenet that in this country a person is always innocent until proven guilty, he would not have been expelled on the basis of an accusation. He would not have been deprived of his education, he would not have had his career prospects ruined, and he would not have lost his daughter.
[…]
The Hes plan to return to China after the dispute about their daughter is settled.
If they do plan to return, now that they have four children, I wonder
how they’ll skirt the one-child policy? I understand that a lot of
Chinese who intended to go back elect to stay in the U.S. when they
realize that their kids will get the worst of it when they return.
On that note, despite O’Connor’s closing line, Larry Parrish, the lawyer
for the foster family, accused the Hes of engineering the dispute as a
means of staying in America. An article
in the University of Memphis’s student newspaper quotes Parrish:
“Jack He is extremely intelligent and very fluent and is a con-artist. He is the best I’ve ever seen,” Parrish said. “He plays on the sympathies of other people. He creates situations that are not real.”
Parrish contended the Hes were using the situation as a way to stay in America. If not for the custody battle the Hes would have been deported, Parrish said.
Parrish also said, “he is the most dishonest witness I have ever seen. That’s why the courts have found him completely without credibility.”
I assume this is the usual character assassination one would expect from
an thorough attorney. Does it lend any credence to the original
charges against He? It’s doubtful: He was cleared by a court of law.
And that’s where the stories converge: in each of these cases, a
University judicial system ignored the verdict of a court of law and
soldiered on, either finding the student guilty or thrusting him into
academic limbo. In the Harvard case, Zedginidze had taken a leave
during the trial, and was all but told not to petition for
re-admission, as Harvard might (if he reapplied) actually find him
guilty of rape and expel him.
According to the Globe, if Zedginidze managed to persuade the
university to schedule a hearing, he’d have no right to confront his
accuser, no right of cross-examination, and no right to an attorney –
in other words, standard practice for the Star
Chamber a University tribunal. The Honor Committee at
Princeton has much the same rules. I’m not sure about the Committee on
Discipline, but I’d be shocked if it were much better.
As for the He case, the articles that I’ve read do not give the
specifics of the University’s sanctions. Was He actually expelled? Was
he “persuaded” to take a leave of absence, as was Zedginidze? Or did
the U. of Memphis just cancel his fellowship? As doctoral students are
generally paid by the University to go to school, the latter would be
a crippling loss. In most fields, if you are paying for a doctorate,
you’re probably being ripped off. There is a quid pro quo, of
course: the students provide fairly cheap labor, which is why schools
(particularly schools of the humanities) admit so many of them. But I
digress – you can read more about that
here.
In any event, one can only be happy that the He family has been
reunited. One wonders how we ended up with a system were
unaccountable-bureaucrat courts can ruin students’ careers (and,
indirectly, break up families) on the basis of allegations that real
courts have found to be baseless.
On the other hand, would Shaoqiang He have fared better, had he not
been in tried by the University of Memphis’s tribunal, but in his
native China?
“The flight was already delayed 15 minutes and in fairness to the other 112 passengers on the plane, the crew made an operational decision to remove the family,” AirTran spokeswoman Judy Graham-Weaver said.
[…]
The Orlando-based carrier reimbursed the family $595.80, the cost of the three tickets, and the Kuleszas flew home the next day.
They also were offered three roundtrip tickets anywhere the airline flies, Graham-Weaver said.
The father said his family would never fly AirTran again.
I, on the other hand, plan to fly with them whenever possible. This
is a victory for air travelers everywhere.
I’m all in favor of children, certainly—America has anough
child-free nitwits, although
certainly not as many as Europe.* And children can certainly be
loud—that’s why I wear earplugs. But if your kid is going to waste a collective 28
man-hours* of innocent bystanders’ time, then slip her a damn
mickey before
the flight. Or drive.
[**] (In fairness, the article doesn’t say if the 15-minute delay was the kid’s fault or if the plane was already late before they boarded.)
AirTran, incidentally, is the successor to ValuJet, which suffered the
infamous ValuJet Flight
592 crash in the
Florida Everglades. I’m not complaining: they fly the BOS-CAK route, cheap.
My brother Davide’s soap opera “The Gates” made the semifinal round of
the SoapU contest. If you can spare a second, I’d love it if you could
help him out by voting for his episode. (Voting takes about three
seconds – you don’t actually have to watch the episode if you’re in a
hurry.)
To vote, just go to SoapU.com and click
the preview pic next to “The Gates; Columbia University; Davide
Barillari”. The show should start playing. You can click one of the
rating buttons below the video to vote for the episode. (I recommend a
“10”, but of course, I’m biased.)
I had some trouble with Firefox, but your mileage may vary – I have
some exotic extensions installed. Internet Explorer worked perfectly,
though.
An African-American associate professor has threatened to go on hunger
strike unless the provost resigns and his tenure is granted,
protesting what he claims were racist motives behind the denial of his
tenure. The Department of Biological Engineering decided not to
advance BE Associate Professor James L. Sherley.s case for tenure on
Dec. 13, 2004. Since then, Sherley has asked senior administrators to
overturn his department’s decision.
[…]
In a December letter sent out to MIT faculty calling for support,
Sherley said, “I will either see the Provost resign and my hard-earned
tenure granted at MIT, or I will die defiantly right outside his
office. This is the strength of my conviction that racism in American
[sic] must end. What better place to kill a small part of it than at a
great institution like MIT.”
There’s no doubt that the tenure process needs reform. That the
current system makes it very difficult to have women to have both
children and a high-powered academic career is beyond dispute. The
left decries the lack of minority professors at top schools and cries
racism. The right regularly blasts “tenured radicals” and demands
limited-term contracts for faculty. (A small number of (usually
obscure) schools have even tried this.) I have my doubts that
Prof. Sherley’s tactic will work, but I’m also surprised that more of
the media haven’t picked up on this.
Incidentally, if you read magazines like First Things or The
Weekly Standard and see references to an MIT professor who bashes
embryonic-stem cell research and flogs adult stem cells, it’s often
Prof. Sherley. See, for instance,
this and
this,
both by my former college classmate Ryan Anderson.
[The scene: 5 Bryant Street, home of the Chinese department office. Three other students and I are reviewing a skit with one of the teachers. I’ve corrected some of my grammatical errors for clarity.]
Me: “Nín xǐ huān tāng ma?” (您喜歡湯嗎?) [Do you like soup?]
Teacher: It should be “Nín xǐ huān hé tāng ma?” (您喜歡喝湯嗎?) [Do you like to drink soup?]
(later)
Me: “Nín xǐ huān ròu ma?” (您喜歡肉嗎?) [Do you like meat?]
Teacher: It should be “Nín xǐ huān chī ròu ma?” (您喜歡吃肉嗎?) [Do you like to eat meat?]
(later)
Me: “Nín xǐ huān dòufu ma?” (您喜豆腐嗎?) [Do you like tofu?] Wait, no…[I’m sensing a pattern here] it’s “Nín xǐ huān chī dòufu ma?” (您喜吃豆腐嗎?) [Do you like to eat tofu?]
Teacher: Er, it’s just “xǐ huān dòufu.” “chī dòufu” means…something else.
Me: Is it bad?
Teacher: Yes.
I didn’t press it. Native speakers: can you cast any illumination on this one? I’d love to know.
Update: From my collaborator on a comp. sci. project:
i saw your post because your site was on digg.
"eat someone's tofu" means to touch someone in private parts.
i had a taiwanese girlfriend.
Rock on, Intarweb! That was quick.
That said, what on earth am I doing in digg? As of right now (12:36 am
on the 5th), the Dan Peng article
is in the third slot. I wrote it in April of 2003; it showed up on
Slashdot
a bit later. Dan
settled with the RIAA in May 2003.
I’m surprised that there’s still life in that page. I guess this is
why Jakob Nielsen marked undated
content as #3 on the Top
Ten Mistakes in Web Design. (There are dates in the article – but
they’re at the very bottom.)
While raiding the KSG library for a copy of Christopher Lasch’s*
The Revolt of the Elites that wasn’t falling apart (as was
Lamont’s), a slim volume with “pandering” on the spine caught my
eye. Since the propensity of politicians to pander is one of my (and
Carlos’s)
favorite laments, I pulled it.
It was Sen. Paul Simon’s Our Culture of
Pandering, in which he bashes the American media, political, educational,
and religious establishment. The book throws out a number of obvious
and quite fair attacks: the increasingly centralized and
profit-obsessed American media delivers salaciousness rather than
substance, American public schools are the laughingstock of the
developed world, American churches pay a lot of lip service to
charity but few are willing to ask their congregations to sacrifice
for it, and American politicians are decidedly unwilling to show real
leadership. Regarding the last, Simon related a conversation with
Rep. Richard
Kelly
(R-FL; later imprisoned for his role in the
Abscam scandal). Kelley agreed
that increasing foreign-aid spending was in the national interest,
but said his constituents wouldn’t stand for it.
Simon asked how many letters Kelly received against foreign aid in
the month prior.
“Probably half a dozen,” he replied.
Interestingly, the xenophobia (xeno-indifference might be a better
term) theme ran through all four chapters. American colleges don’t
send enough students to study abroad (Simon wonders if we would have
had a war in Vietnam had LBJ spent a semester in Asia). American
churches are far more willing to raise money for new buildings than
for foreign or disaster aid abroad. American newspapers spend more
time covering celebrity scandals than international developments (to
say nothing of TV news). And American politicians (as above), even if
they believe that more foreign aid spending would benefit America (to
say nothing of the world), are generally unwilling to show much
backbone on the issue. (After reading Easterly’s
book, I’m more than a little skeptical
of using raw spending as a measure of our commitment to helping the
destitute abroad, but the point is well taken.)
* I also pulled Lasch’s posthumous
Women and the Common Life: Love, Marriage, and Feminism. More
will follow on that one, but, before I forget, a little anecdote: On
the plane back to Boston, the woman in the next seat saw the title
asked what I was reading. I grasped for words, settling for “a
neo-neo-neo critique of neo-feminist thought.” (Whatever that meant.)
“That’s interesting. I’m a mother of four – what does he have to
say?” I described the chapter on Betty Friedan’s The Feminine
Mystique I’d read earlier that evening – how women and
(surprisingly) children were harmed when their mothers spent so much
time on home-making, including her speculation that the Chinese were
able to “break” as many captured Americans in the Korean War as they
did because they were weakened by that sort of parenting. I also
described an earlier chapter on the suburbanization of the American
family and the consequent decline of civic life (in which women did
not work for pay but ran relief efforts, temperance groups, suffrage
leagues, and various civic organizations) — leading to the creation
of the stay-at-home mother.
My seatmate asked about Friedan’s biography (did she have kids?) It’s
rather macabre to admit, but I wouldn’t have known if she hadn’t been
in an Economist
obituary
a few months ago. I explained that she did, but I did get the number
wrong – she had three children, not two.
“Ah,” she gushed, “it’s so great that you’re trying to understand
women!”
If you sent mail to any @barillari.org address between early September
and late December, it most likely did not get through. The mail server
for barillari.org stopped working in early September. Because the vast
majority of the mail sent to @barillari.org addresses is bulk mail, I
didn’t make fixing it a high priority. My apologies if you sent
anything to a @barillari.org email address during that period — it
should be working now.
Graham Greene. The Heart of the Matter. The Viking Press,
1948. p.52:
It seemed to Scobie that life was immeasurably
long. Couldn’t the test of man have been carried out in fewer years?
Couldn’t we have committed our first major sin at seven, have ruined
ourselves for love or hate at ten, have clutched at redemption at a
fifteen-year-old death bed?
Luc Sante. Low Life: Lures and Snares of Old New York. Farrar, Streaus, and Giroux. 1991. p.309:
There was very little that adult gangsters practiced or enjoyed that
child gangsters did not contrive to reproduce on their own
scale. There were boys’ saloons, with three-cent whiskies and little
girls in the back rooms, and there were children’s gambling houses, in
which tots could bilk other tots at the usual menu of faro, policy,
and dice games. […]
If it seems that these children must have very
early used up the entire stock of adult pleasures—sex, drink,
gambling, extortion, racketeering, fraud, intimidation, unfair
competition, price-fixing, terrorism—it should be remembered that
the life expectancy for kids growing up under these conditions could
not have been very high.The whole adult order of high and low
sensations had to be experienced in fifteen or twenty years at best
before they succumbed to disease, malnutrition, exposure, stab wounds,
or gunfire.
Just finished Will Easterly’s The White Man’s Burden: Why the
West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little
good.
I read Lamont Library’s copy, so I had the benefit of someone’s
crabbed marginalia. Among the more illuminating pencilings: “the
worst neo-lib crap available on the free market” (on the title
page), “so McDonald would be the big push? what a crap theory!”
(below a section contrasting aid-planners’ inflexibility to Ray Kroc’s
leap from selling mixers to running restaurants). This petered out
after the first chapter — I suppose he or she dumped the book in
disgust.
The central argument is that developing-country problems can be better
solved with tweezers than with sledgehammers. In other words,
aid-givers with narrow, well-defined goals and clear measures of
success are more likely to do good than those with open-ended goals
and hundreds of objectives, even if they have (as they often do)
colossal budgets. Easterly calls the former “searchers” and the latter
“planners” or “big push” projects, but he might as well call them “Smile Train”
(insert any narrowly-targeted charity here) and “Jeffrey Sachs”.
Unfortunately for the world’s poor, students of the Sachs school
include Western governments, the UN, the World Bank, the IMF, big-name
philanthropists, and Bono.
I’m occasionally a bystander to international-development chatter, so
Easterly’s nonstop tweaks at ID bureaucratese were a nice touch. He
devotes the middle of one chapter to such succinctly-titled entities
as “The Open-Ended Ad-Hoc Working Group on Integrated and Coordinated
Implementation of and Follow-up to the Outcomes of the Major United
Nations Conferences and Summits in the Economic and Social
Fields”. Near the end, he finds a report by the “Joint Venture on
Managing for Development Results for the DAC Working Party on Aid
Effectiveness and Donor Practices” called “Managing for Development
Results, Principles in Action: Sourcebook on Emerging Good Practice.”
One Scalian section lists reports produced by aid agencies:
“…besides the UN’s 3,751-page Investing in Development:
A Practical Plan to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals, we have
the British government’s 453 page Our Common Future: Report of the
Commission for Africa, plus the latest update of the IMF and the World
Bank’s 1,246 page PSRP Sourcebook…”
For this world in which Bangladeshi children die of diarrhea while Big
Aid keeps International Paper in business, Easterly blames misaligned
incentives. Western aid agencies are not actually rewarded for
achieving their goals, only for setting them. Mere expenditures are
often used as a measure of success. Easterly’s reductio ad
absurdam: would those who paid $10 to see the 2005 flop
Catwoman be mollified in knowing that the producers dumped $100
million into the film? (The Catwoman analogy appeared in his
2005 Foreign
Policy article
– I guess it was too good not to reprint.) Today, the ONE
Campaign advocates pushing
1% of the U.S. federal budget into foreign aid – on top of the
$2,300,000,000,000 that the West spent on foreign aid over the last 50
years.
Perhaps to avoid the “neocon toady” slur, the second part of the book
heaps scorn on the American nation-builders in Iraq in 2003 (and
Afghanistan in 2001 and El Salvador in the 1980s and Vietnam in 1961
and Guatemala in 1954 and so on). As an economist, he proclaims
himself unqualified to judge the national security benefits of each of
these interventions, but finds that they did little economic good
(besides spurring an “explosion of Vietnamese restaurants” and
Guatemalan handicraft shops in the U.S.). He’s a fan of markets, but
not of recent efforts to create them. On post-communist Eastern
Europe, he explains that the “chief recipients of foreign aid were the
Big Six accounting firms,” to whom fell the task of writing new laws.
AIDS activists also get their sacred cow gored: Easterly asserts that
campaigns to bring (expensive) AIDS drugs to the poorest parts of the
world are wasting money better spent on (cheap) prevention. One of his
more macabre observations: spending money on AIDS treatment rather
than prevention actually makes the AIDS crisis worse, because
treated people live longer and can spread the disease
further. Easterly blames anti-condom conservatives in the U.S. and
AIDS activists who found an easy target in Big Pharma.
His success stories are narrowly targeted and often home-grown —
private colleges launched by Indians and Ghanaians, a
Unilever-sponsored handwashing campaign to fight diarrhea in India,
entrepreneurs selling anti-malarial bed nets in Malawi (free nets
tended to end up as fishing equipment). His parting shot calls for
more of those narrowly-focused campaigns, a willingness of aid donors
to forget about self-sufficiency (in other words, abandon the tired
story about teaching men to fish and just feed the starving kids), and
more independent evaluation of the outcomes of aid projects. He calls
this, in not so many words, a scientific approach to aid. You’d think
that this would be obvious, but then again, I was floored a few years
ago when I started hanging out at Harvard Med and found out that
something called “evidence-based medicine” was the the next big
thing. (What on earth were doctors practicing before?)
The book is a few dozen pages too long, most of which are taken up by
tedious and unnecessary examples of capitalism at work, many of which
somehow manage to involve his children. The central dichotomy between
“searchers” and “planners” makes the latter out to be so outrageously
wrong that one might accuse Easterly of setting up a strawman. Since
he takes on the entire 20th century’s worth of Western foreign aid and
humanitarian military intervention, he could easily be accused of
cherry-picking the worst examples of big-push aid to bulk up the
scarecrow. But neither of these detract much from the book. Highly
recommended, particularly if you can get a copy after a starry-eyed
development groupie had a go at it.
P.S. Someone deserves an award for Amazon’s “search inside the
book” feature. Have you ever wasted ten minutes looking for a passage
that you know was there somewhere, should have bookmarked, but
didn’t? I rarely have to do that anymore.
President George W. Bush queues up with other world leaders for his complimentary haircut at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum in Hanoi on Sunday, Nov. 19, 2006. (AP Photo/Hoang Dinh Nam, Pool; via Yahoo! News)
Sacha Baron Cohen’s
Borat
is awash in praise these days, but I’ve seen surprisingly little
attention paid to an interesting tidbit from the title character’s
past. From Wikipedia:
“[Cohen] … attended Christ’s College at the University
of Cambridge where he read history and wrote his dissertation on
Jewish involvement in the American Civil Rights movement, focusing
especially on the 1964 murders of James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and
Michael Schwerner in Mississippi.
Perhaps not coincidentally, it’s the Southerners who get the worst of
it in his film. Borat hitchhikes with a trio of drunken South Carolina
college students who lament the end of slavery. He incites a rodeo
audience into cheering (supposedly faked via careful editing) his wish
that “George W. Bush drink the blood of every man, woman, and child in
Iraq.” He prank-falls in a Confederate memorabilia shop, destroying
hundreds of dollars of merchandise. And, in the film’s most infamous
scene, (at a dinner party on Secession Drive, no less) he hands a bag
of his own excrement to his hostess.
Borat also delivers a bizarre on-air interview with
WAPT, a Mississippi-based TV
station. Again, according to Wikipedia, WAPT had a “long history of
discrimination against African-Americans in news coverage and advocacy
against Civil Rights” – a fact unlikely to have escaped Cohen. (A
WAPT producer later claimed to have lost her job after Cohen’s
production company duped her into booking the interview.)
The only Americans to get a real pass are a group of black teenagers
he meets outside a school (they lower his pants and teach him their
dialect), a middle-aged black prostitute (one of the few professional
actors in the film) who Borat marries and brings back to Kazakhstan, a
Jewish couple who run a bed and breakfast, and the participants in a
Washington, D.C. gay pride parade. All of these are archetypal good
guys in contemporary American cinema – but in fairness to Cohen,
no-one could accuse his employment of them as being anything but
original.
Nearly everything at the military museum in Beijing is placarded
in both English and Chinese. Except (not by chance, I’d imagine) the gallery on the Korean War. Or, as the signpost diplomatically calls it, “Hall of Resisting US Aggression and Aiding Korea.”
The Fertility Gap
Liberal politics will prove fruitless as long as liberals refuse to multiply.
[…]
But the data on young Americans tell a different story. Simply put,
liberals have a big baby problem: They’re not having enough of them,
they haven’t for a long time, and their pool of potential new voters
is suffering as a result. According to the 2004 General Social Survey,
if you picked 100 unrelated politically liberal adults at random, you
would find that they had, between them, 147 children. If you picked
100 conservatives, you would find 208 kids. That’s a “fertility gap”
of 41%. Given that about 80% of people with an identifiable party
preference grow up to vote the same way as their parents, this gap
translates into lots more little Republicans than little Democrats to
vote in future elections. Over the past 30 years this gap has not been
below 20%–explaining, to a large extent, the current ineffectiveness
of liberal youth voter campaigns today.
This is what I’ll point to next time someone suggests that the U.S. ought to have compulsory voting like Australia or Brazil or what-have-you:
Three quarters of Americans can correctly identify two of Snow White’s seven dwarfs while only a quarter can name two Supreme Court Justices, according to a poll on pop culture released on Monday.
[…]
Respondents were far more familiar with the Three Stooges – Larry, Curly and Moe – than the three branches of the U.S. government – judicial, executive and legislative. Seventy-four percent identified the former, 42 percent the latter.
As more and more entrepreneurs start building what Fred
Wilson referred to as second derivative companies, I think they run a
big risk of designing a product/service that is targeted at too small
of an audience. Too many companies are targeting an audience of
53,651. That’s how many people subscribe to Michael Arrington’s
TechCrunch blog feed. I’m a big fan of Techcrunch – and read it
every day. However, the Techcrunch audience is NOT a mainstream
America audience.
WebDAV is a nice, lightweight, widely implemented network filesystem
protocol. davfs2 is the client implementation for Linux, which lets
you mount a remote WebDAV server.
Heaven forbid that you should confuse it, though. If you confuse
davfs2 (as I did, by trying to unmount the same share twice), you
might get this delightfully cryptic and mildly ungrammatical error
message:
/sbin/mount.davfs: Process 5852 already uses device cfs0.
Maybe it's only a stale pid-file left from unclean shutdown.
Please clean up manually.
Notice the lack of any hint as to where that pidfile is. The phrase
“Maybe it’s only a stale pid-file left from unclean shutdown.” doesn’t
appear in a Google or a Yahoo search; I hope putting it here will
fix that.
I thought I’d be smart about this. “I know!,” I said, “I’ll use
strace!” (strace prints out all of the
system calls that a program makes, so you can get an idea of what its
inputs and outputs are.)
strace -o foo mount /path/to/mountpoint
Of course, strace revealed not a word about pidfiles, device cfs0, or
the long-dead process 5824. Neither did ltrace.
Eventually I realized/remembered that mount was
(fork/exec)ing mount.davfs, so strace wasn’t picking up
anything that happened after the fork—which is when all of the
interesting stuff happened.
Thankfully, strace has a switch that makes it hang on to
all child processes: -f. So,
strace -f -o foo mount /path/to/mountpoint
…revealed the last few things that mount.davfs was doing:
Note the “AHA!” above. The pidfile was in /var/run.
I have no idea how /var/ is supposed to be arranged. Some
things make sense – logfiles are in /var/log, mail boxes
live in /var/spool/mail (depending on your setup). But
some things make no sense: mysql databases live in
/var/<b>lib</b>/mysql, as if that makes any sense. (They
aren’t code libraries!) I suppose that /var/run makes
sense for pidfiles but why couldn’t it be something obvious like
/var/pids?
(I know. I know. That would be too easy.)
Update: The source of the problem that prompted me to mount and
unmount davfs2 until it died and left behind a stray pidfile was also
in /var/ – the /var/cache/davfs2
directory. As it turns out, if you remove files behind davfs2’s back,
it can get confused, spewing errors like this:
/sbin/mount.davfs: Connection failed, mounting anyway. File system will only be usable when connection comes up.
When I looked at the network dumps (using tethereal "tcp port $PORT" -i lo -d tcp.port==$PORT,http -x -w path-to-output,
which I highly recommend), it turned out that davfs was requesting
files that I’d long since nuked. Blowing away the contents of the
/var/cache/davfs2 fixed the problem. (Why the heck do
these hang around between mounts, anyway?)
This is what I do now that I no longer have CS problem sets
Snopes.com broke with the usual repertoire of urban legends and posted the following:
The English language has at least one nine-letter word
that remains a valid word as each of its letters is successively
removed.
Their solution was “startling,” with the parting note that “there may
be other equally valid solutions.”
As a computer nerd, I couldn’t resist. With a quick hack, I found
13 words of length >= 9 that can be cut down to one letter, leaving a
valid English word each time. (To be fair, I found 12, since “splitting” is a derivative
of “splittings.”)
Note that “splittings” is a whopping ten letters long.
splittings
splitting
slitting
sitting
siting
sting
ting
tin
in
i
I’m using the /usr/share/dict/american-english-large dictionary from
Debian, ignoring all case and throwing out all words with apostrophes. (N.B.: american-english-large includes some unusual plural constructs like “shes” and “hes”.) I’m only counting “a” and “i” as valid one-letter words. Counting all single-letter words as valid under the self-reference rulebumps up the total by two, adding “carousels” and “flashiest,” but adding no words of length > 9.
I used to pride myself on coming up with awful ideasbefore they appeared on the Internet.
So, when I said to myself “hey, why hasn’t someone taken this mashup silliness to its logical conclusion and made a National Sex Offender Registry/Google Maps hybrid?”, I was disappointed to discover that someone had already done that.
I’m still waiting for the crimelibrary.com/Google Maps “Jeffrey Dahmer
Walking Tour” mashup, though…
“So…,” I said to Dan around 3:30 p.m. yesterday, “I’m sorry—I’ve
got to run. I want to put this computer together so I can show the
product to people by the close of business today.”
Ha.
Thirteen hours later, I now think that I might – might! – have the
computer working.
This is why I didn’t go into hardware.
Some tips, so you don’t repeat my mistakes:
Bring the laptop. Always bring the laptop. When I took the new
computer from Boston to Cambridge (where it resides for now), the
voice of reason won out: “Joe, it’ll only slow you down. It’s
really heavy. Besides, you have another computer there. Why would
you need the laptop?” Needless to say, I answered this one around
2 a.m., when I spent an hour or so trying to sort out a DHCP
failure at two in the morning with two potentially-broken
computers.
Don’t move a CD-ROM drive while it’s spinning. I trashed a Knoppix
CD this way. I might have even trashed the drive, because it didn’t
seem to work properly after that (but it might not have been working
to begin with).
The Gigabyte GA-8I945GMF motherboard isn’t just bleeding edge, it’s
freakin’ hemorrhaging wound. Linux 2.6.15 isn’t 31337 enough for
it, apparently – to get the on-board Ethernet to work, I needed
2.6.16. (Note that I said “work”. 2.6.15 recognized that there was
an Ethernet card, but pointedly discarded any data I tried to send
through it. An ancient 3COM boomerang card (which I fortunately had
snagged from MIT reuse some months back) did work, though.
On that same note, if you’re trying to use the motherboard with both
PATA (IDE) and SATA devices, make sure you switch the “On-Chop SATA
Mode” to “Enhanced”. Otherwise, you’ll get delightful errors: after
I booted the Debian installer from CD, it would complain that it
couldn’t find a CD-ROM drive. No, I’m not making this up.
After I managed to get the OS installed and booted, the kernel
started spewing KERN_EMERG errors (“CPU0: Running in modulated clock
mode” “CPU0: Temperature above threshold”) to the console. Googling
confirmed that these are generated by the processor when it thinks
it’s overheating. A gob of thermal paste didn’t help matters, but
reseating the heatsink did. It’s not as though you have to push the
heatsink anchors down hard. You have to push them down reallyreallyreally damned hard. I could have sworn I was going to
ruin the motherboard — which would have been one of the least fun,
but not the least fun, experience I’ve had for $90. (According to
Intel, you’re supposed to mount the heatsink after installing the
motherboard in the chassis – so it’s anchored a half-inch above the
case by a bunch of screws, and has a lot more room to bend than if
it were on the floor.) After I managed to get the confirmatory
click from all of the anchors, I haven’t seen the CPU core
temperature rise above 52 degrees. (Yet. I’m sure it will spike as
soon as I publish this, just to spite me.)
I actually had a related problem with an AMD processor last year
(which is why I had the thermal paste.) I should have learned my
lesson: buy nothing bigger than a Pentium II. Any speed gains from
the speedier processor are more than consumed by the trouble of
getting the faster one not to burn up.
I have a newfound respect for the guys who immersed their entire
computer in cooking oil as a new form of liquid cooling. I’d link to
them, except that I don’t have a web browser. (I’m typing this at
the console. Did you think I was enough of a masochist to try to get
X11 working on this thing?)
I now have the urge to rig up the computer to send me an SMS message
if the CPU core temperature gets too high. I’m not sure what’s
worse: that I know how to do this, or that I am tempted to do so.
All in all, I’m amazed that there are so many Internet sites that
publish twenty-page articles comparing heat sinks or motherboards or
processors – or anything else that requires you to take apart and
reassemble the heatsink-mobo-processor combo more often than
absolutely necessary. (I mean, as far as unpleasant hobbies go, at
least being a fire-eater or a shock rocker gets you the chicks, right?
I am unaware of anyone, anywhere, of any gender, ever having been
seduced by a tricked-out PC.)
As googling for the neologism “Tilghwoman” will confirm, Google
appears to have dropped the online archive of Tiger PDFs from my junior year at
Princeton. Perhaps the link above will fix that.
(Interestingly, as of this writing, Yahoo!’s search engine still
returns a hit for “Tilghwoman”. Score one for Yahoo.)